If you’ve been hearing lately about effective altruism , MacAskill is one of the leading thinkers of the movement. A young Oxford-trained philosopher, Will’s first book, Doing Good Better, was for many an inspiration to have a positive impact on the world by giving what they can to the most rigorously vetted causes. It certainly pushed me in that direction with my own giving.
What We Owe The Future builds a quite different kind of storyline. Foremost, it’s much more of an argument for longtermism, the school of thought that argues that most of human history, and most humans, are in the future and haven’t been born yet. They’re “disinfranchised,” unable to speak for themselves or defend their rights, but their wellbeing can’t be discounted just because they don’t exist. This view is in contrast to “near-termism” that tries to improve conditions for humans and other sentient beings in present and near future.
What We Owe The Future is also consideraably heavier and headier in its philosophy than his previous book. MacAskill is a moral philosopher and The Future digs into the theory with enough vigor to lose me at times. But it also makes way for some very interesting thought experiments that I appreciated – such as estimating the number of neurons in different animals when theorizing about animal welfare, including wildlife.
At times I found the book oddly organized, but that might have been me. In sum, it is a sincere appeal for deep thought on the issues that matter most for the most number of lives, and I admire the complexity of thinking he’s willing to roll out to make his arguments.
Effective altruism is being particularly scrutinized at the moment with the scandals of its riches convert, Sam Bankman Fried, and longtermism is taking the most heat. I invite people to be patient with the argument long enough to give it its due before deciding if is a credible way of thinking about doing good.
(I listened as an audiobook read by the author, complete with Scottish accent)